Maryland Disorderly Conduct Laws: A Comprehensive Legal Guide

Disorderly conduct charges in Maryland can arise from a wide array of actions, often occurring when individuals are perceived to be disturbing the peace, obstructing public ways, or engaging in behavior that causes annoyance or alarm to others. While seemingly minor, a conviction for disorderly conduct in Maryland carries serious implications, including potential jail time, significant fines, and a permanent criminal record that can affect future employment, housing, and educational opportunities. Understanding the specific nuances of Maryland’s laws and the legal process is paramount for anyone facing such allegations.

At Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., we have observed firsthand how swiftly a situation can escalate into a criminal charge. My two decades of practical experience defending individuals across Maryland reveal that these cases often hinge on subjective interpretations of public order and individual conduct. It’s not merely about what happened, but how it is perceived, documented, and presented in court. This guide delves into the complexities of Maryland disorderly conduct law, offering insights derived from years of hands-on experience in the courtroom.

What Constitutes Disorderly Conduct in Maryland?

Disorderly conduct in Maryland is broadly defined under Maryland Criminal Law Article § 10-201. This statute encompasses a range of behaviors that disturb public peace, obstruct public passages, or interfere with lawful activities. It’s important to understand that the law is not limited to boisterous or aggressive actions; even seemingly minor disturbances can lead to a charge if they disrupt public order. As a seasoned attorney, I’ve seen disorderly conduct charges applied to situations ranging from verbal altercations to failure to disperse.

Key Elements of Disorderly Conduct Under MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201:

• Disturbing the Peace: This is the most common ground for a charge. It involves acting in a disorderly manner that disturbs the public peace. This can include fighting, making unreasonable noise, or using offensive language in a way that is likely to incite violence or disturb others. The key here is that the conduct must actually disturb the peace of others, or be likely to do so.
• Obstructing Passageways: Intentionally obstructing the free passage of another in a public way. This means blocking sidewalks, streets, or public doorways, and refusing to move when ordered by law enforcement.
• Hindering Business or Lawful Assembly: Intentionally hindering or obstructing any person in a lawful assembly or transaction of business. This could apply to protests that block access to buildings or disrupt commercial activities.
• Failing to Obey a Lawful Order: Failing to obey a reasonable and lawful order of a law enforcement officer to disperse or move on from a public place. This often arises in situations involving crowds or protests.
• Disrupting School Activities: Willfully disturbing a public or private school.
• Making a False Fire Alarm: Knowingly making a false statement or report to any person in a position of authority that a fire or other emergency exists, or intentionally activating a fire alarm system in a building.

My experience has shown that these elements are often subject to interpretation by responding officers and, subsequently, by the court. What one officer deems “disturbing the peace,” another might view as merely annoying. This subjectivity creates opportunities for defense, particularly when the prosecution struggles to prove every element of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.

Consequences and Penalties for Disorderly Conduct in Maryland

A conviction for disorderly conduct in Maryland is typically a misdemeanor offense. While it may not carry the same severity as a felony, the penalties can still be significant, impacting an individual’s immediate freedom and long-term prospects. The maximum penalty for a standard disorderly conduct charge under MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201 is a fine of up to $500 and imprisonment for up to 60 days. However, certain specific acts of disorderly conduct, such as those involving dangerous weapons or disrupting school, may carry enhanced penalties.

Potential Consequences Include:

• Jail Time: While 60 days might seem minor compared to felony sentences, even a brief period of incarceration can disrupt employment, family life, and personal stability. Judges often consider the specific facts of the case, the defendant’s criminal history, and aggravating or mitigating factors when determining sentencing.
• Fines: The maximum fine of $500 can accumulate quickly when combined with court costs and administrative fees.
• Criminal Record: Perhaps the most enduring consequence is the creation of a permanent criminal record. Even a misdemeanor conviction can appear on background checks conducted by potential employers, landlords, and educational institutions. This can severely limit future opportunities and professional advancement.
• Impact on Professional Licenses: For individuals holding professional licenses (e.g., healthcare, law, finance), a criminal conviction, even a misdemeanor, can trigger disciplinary proceedings or even lead to the suspension or revocation of their license.
• Immigration Consequences: For non-U.S. citizens, a disorderly conduct conviction could have unforeseen immigration consequences, including issues with visa applications, green card renewals, or even deportation proceedings, depending on the specifics of the case.
• Probation and Court Orders: In lieu of or in addition to jail time and fines, a court may impose probation, requiring the defendant to comply with specific conditions, such as attending anger management classes, performing community service, or avoiding certain individuals or locations.

The severity of these consequences underscores the importance of a vigorous defense. My seasoned perspective dictates that no charge, however minor it may seem on the surface, should be taken lightly. The long-term ramifications of a conviction far outweigh the immediate inconvenience of seeking legal counsel.

Navigating the Legal Process: From Incident to Resolution

The legal process for a disorderly conduct charge in Maryland typically begins with an incident leading to arrest or citation by a local law enforcement agency. The case then proceeds through the Maryland court system, primarily the District Court, where preliminary hearings, plea negotiations, and potentially a trial will occur. Understanding each step is crucial for anyone facing a charge and for mounting an effective defense. The Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. have guided countless clients through this complex journey, ensuring they are prepared at every turn.

Key Steps in the Maryland Legal Process:

1. The Incident and Police Involvement:

   This is where it all begins. A call to the police, an officer observing an alleged disturbance, or a complaint from a member of the public can lead to law enforcement intervention. The primary agencies involved include the Maryland State Police, county sheriff’s departments, and municipal police departments. Officers will investigate, gather evidence, and may issue a criminal citation or make an arrest. If arrested, the individual will be taken to a detention center for processing (fingerprinting, booking) and may be held until a bail review hearing.

2. Charging and Initial Appearance:

   If a citation is issued, it will contain a court date. If an arrest is made, a Commissioner will set bail or release conditions. The charge officially enters the system when a Statement of Charges is filed with the Maryland District Court. The first court appearance is usually an arraignment or an initial hearing, where the defendant is formally informed of the charges and can enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest.

3. Discovery and Pre-Trial Motions:

   Once a “not guilty” plea is entered, the discovery phase begins. This involves the exchange of information between the prosecution (Office of the State’s Attorney) and the defense. Defense attorneys will review police reports, witness statements, and any available video or audio evidence. This is a critical stage for identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and formulating defense strategies. Pre-trial motions, such as motions to suppress evidence or to dismiss the case, may be filed.

4. Negotiation and Plea Bargaining:

   Many disorderly conduct cases are resolved through plea bargaining. The Office of the State’s Attorney may offer a reduced charge, a lesser penalty, or a Stet (indefinite postponement) agreement in exchange for a guilty plea. Experienced counsel from Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. will evaluate any offer against the strength of the evidence and the potential risks of going to trial, always advocating for the client’s best interests.

5. Trial (if applicable):

   If no plea agreement is reached, the case proceeds to trial in the Maryland District Court. For misdemeanor offenses like disorderly conduct, trials are typically bench trials, meaning a judge hears the evidence and renders a verdict without a jury. Both the prosecution and the defense will present evidence, call witnesses, and make closing arguments. If convicted, the judge will proceed to sentencing.

6. Sentencing and Appeals:

   If found guilty, the judge will impose a sentence based on the Maryland statutes and sentencing guidelines. This could include fines, jail time, probation, or community service. If a defendant believes there were legal errors in the District Court trial, they have the right to appeal the decision to the Maryland Circuit Court. An appeal is not a new trial but a review of the lower court’s proceedings for legal errors.

   Throughout this entire process, the role of a knowledgeable and experienced legal team, such as Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., cannot be overstated. We ensure clients understand their rights, are prepared for each court appearance, and have a robust defense strategy in place.

   The SRIS Maryland Disorderly Conduct Defense Navigator Tool

   Facing a disorderly conduct charge in Maryland can be daunting, but with the right guidance, you can navigate the complexities more effectively. The SRIS Maryland Disorderly Conduct Defense Navigator is designed to provide you with a structured approach to understand your situation and prepare for what’s ahead. This tool distills decades of legal experience into actionable steps, helping you organize your thoughts and information crucial for your defense.

   The SRIS Maryland Disorderly Conduct Defense Navigator Tool: Your Step-by-Step Guide

   This checklist is not a substitute for legal advice but a preparatory tool to help you gather essential information before consulting with an attorney at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C.

   1. Immediate Actions Post-Incident:

      • Do NOT talk to the police beyond identifying yourself. Invoke your right to remain silent.
      • Do NOT resist arrest. Compliance, even if you believe the arrest is unlawful, is critical.
      • Note down details immediately. As soon as it’s safe, write down everything you remember: time, date, location, names of officers, what they said, what you said, presence of witnesses, anything you observed (e.g., cameras, other people).
      • Seek medical attention if injured. Document any injuries with photos and medical reports.

   2. Information Gathering & Documentation:

      • Police Report: Obtain a copy of the police report once available.
      • Citation/Charging Document: Keep the original citation or charging document safe. Note the court date and location.
      • Witness Information: If any witnesses were present, try to get their contact information (name, phone, email) and a brief statement of what they saw.
      • Relevant Communications: Any text messages, emails, or social media posts related to the incident or parties involved.
      • Surveillance Footage: Identify if there were any surveillance cameras in the area (private businesses, public cameras).

   3. Understanding the Charge:

      • Specific Allegations: Which specific part of MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201 are you charged under? (e.g., disturbing the peace, obstructing passage).
      • Officer’s Rationale: What was the officer’s stated reason for the charge?
      • Your Account: Prepare a clear, concise narrative of your version of events, focusing on objective facts.

   4. Identifying Potential Defenses:

      • Lack of Intent: Did you intentionally act in a disorderly manner?
      • Freedom of Speech: Was your conduct protected speech under the First Amendment (e.g., lawful protest)?
      • Self-Defense/Defense of Others: Were your actions necessary to protect yourself or someone else?
      • False Accusation/Mistaken Identity: Were you wrongly accused or misidentified?
      • Police Misconduct: Did the officers act outside their legal authority?

   5. Preparing for Legal Consultation:

      • List of Questions: Write down all questions you have for your attorney.
      • Prior Record: Be prepared to discuss any prior arrests or convictions, even if expunged.
      • Desired Outcome: What is your ideal outcome for the case? (e.g., dismissal, reduced charge, not guilty verdict).

   By diligently working through this Navigator, you will not only gain a clearer understanding of your situation but also provide your legal team at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. with the comprehensive information needed to build a robust defense on your behalf.

   Effective Legal Strategies and Defenses

   Mounting a robust defense against a Maryland disorderly conduct charge requires a detailed understanding of the elements of the crime, the specifics of your case, and the nuances of Maryland’s legal system. Seasoned attorneys employ a range of strategies, from challenging the facts presented by the prosecution to asserting constitutional rights. My two decades of experience in the courtroom have shown that effective defense relies on meticulous investigation and strategic presentation.

   Common Legal Strategies and Defenses:

   • Challenging the “Disturbance of Peace” Element:

     Maryland law requires that the disorderly conduct actually disturb the peace of others, or be likely to do so. Often, the police claim a disturbance based on a single complaint or their own subjective interpretation. We can argue that the conduct, while perhaps annoying, did not rise to the level of genuinely disturbing public peace. For example, was the “noise” truly unreasonable given the context? Was the “offensive language” directed at an individual or merely part of a broader expression?

   • First Amendment Protection (Freedom of Speech):

     The First Amendment protects a wide range of expressive conduct, including speech that some might find offensive. If the alleged disorderly conduct primarily involves speech, we can argue that it was protected by the First Amendment and therefore cannot be the basis for a criminal charge. This defense is particularly relevant in cases involving protests or expressive demonstrations, where the state’s interest in maintaining public order must be balanced against individual rights. However, this protection is not absolute; “fighting words” or speech that incites imminent violence are generally not protected.

   • Lack of Intent:

     Many disorderly conduct charges require an element of “willfulness” or “intent” to disturb the peace or obstruct. If your actions were accidental, unintentional, or you were unaware that your conduct was causing a disturbance, a lack of intent can be a powerful defense. For example, if you unknowingly obstructed a passageway, it might not meet the statutory requirement.

   • Self-Defense or Defense of Others:

     If your actions, which led to the disorderly conduct charge, were taken in reasonable self-defense or in defense of another person, this can serve as a complete defense. This typically applies to situations where a physical altercation occurs, and you were merely responding to an imminent threat.

   • Insufficient Evidence:

     The prosecution bears the burden of proving every element of the disorderly conduct charge beyond a reasonable doubt. If there are inconsistencies in witness testimonies, a lack of corroborating evidence (like video footage), or if the police report is vague or contradictory, we can argue that the state has failed to meet its burden of proof. This is where meticulous cross-examination of police officers and witnesses becomes crucial.

   • Mistaken Identity or False Accusation:

     In some cases, individuals are wrongly identified or falsely accused, often due to misunderstandings, personal animosity, or poor lighting conditions. Building an alibi or presenting evidence that you were not the person who committed the alleged act can be an effective defense.

   • Police Misconduct/Procedural Errors:

     If law enforcement officers violated your constitutional rights during the arrest or investigation (e.g., unlawful search and seizure, failure to read Miranda rights, excessive force), evidence obtained through such violations may be suppressed, potentially weakening the prosecution’s case or leading to dismissal.

   Each disorderly conduct case is unique, and the most effective strategy will depend on the specific facts and circumstances. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. conducts a thorough analysis of every detail to craft a defense tailored to your situation, aiming for the best possible outcome.

   Common Mistakes to Avoid in Disorderly Conduct Cases

   Having navigated countless disorderly conduct cases in Maryland, I’ve observed several common pitfalls that can significantly undermine a defendant’s position. Avoiding these mistakes is as crucial as building a strong defense, as they can inadvertently strengthen the prosecution’s case or limit your legal options. At Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., we emphasize proactive measures to protect your rights from the outset.

   1. Arguing with or Resisting Police Officers:

      When confronted by law enforcement, many individuals feel frustrated or unjustly targeted. However, arguing, yelling, or physically resisting an officer’s lawful commands, even if you believe you are innocent, can quickly escalate the situation and lead to additional charges, such as resisting arrest or assault on a law enforcement officer. These secondary charges are often more serious than the initial disorderly conduct allegation. Remain calm, polite, and assert your right to remain silent.

   2. Providing Statements to Law Enforcement:

      Anything you say to the police can and will be used against you in court. Many people believe they can “explain away” the situation, but often, these explanations provide the prosecution with incriminating evidence or inconsistencies that can be exploited during trial. Even seemingly innocent statements can be twisted or misunderstood. Always politely state that you wish to speak with an attorney before answering any questions.

   3. Failing to Document the Incident:

      Memory fades, and details become blurred. Immediately after the incident, while details are fresh, make detailed notes of everything you remember: the time, location, what was said by all parties, the actions of the officers, descriptions of any witnesses, and any surrounding circumstances (e.g., lighting, crowd size, presence of cameras). This information is invaluable for your legal team to reconstruct the event and build a defense.

   4. Not Seeking Legal Counsel Promptly:

      Delaying consultation with an experienced Maryland criminal defense attorney is a critical error. The sooner you engage legal representation, the sooner evidence can be preserved, witnesses interviewed, and a defense strategy can be formulated. Early intervention can often lead to a more favorable outcome, such as having charges dropped or reduced before they even reach trial.

   5. Discussing Your Case on Social Media:

      In today’s digital age, sharing details about your legal troubles on social media platforms is a common, yet dangerous, mistake. Prosecutors frequently scour social media for information that can be used against defendants. Even seemingly innocuous posts, photos, or comments can be taken out of context or used to challenge your credibility. Refrain from posting anything about your case, and consider making your profiles private.

   6. Ignoring Court Dates or Legal Paperwork:

      Missing a court date, even accidentally, can result in a warrant for your arrest and additional charges. Failing to respond to legal notices or requests for information can also severely prejudice your case. Always be meticulous about keeping track of court dates and promptly addressing all legal correspondence. If you are unsure about any document, consult your attorney immediately.

   By being aware of and actively avoiding these common pitfalls, you significantly improve your chances of achieving a favorable outcome in your Maryland disorderly conduct case. The Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. are here to guide you through every step, ensuring your rights are protected.

   Glossary of Key Legal Terms

   Navigating the legal landscape of a disorderly conduct charge in Maryland often involves encountering specific legal terminology. Understanding these terms is crucial for comprehending your situation and the advice of your legal counsel. Here’s a brief glossary of terms relevant to MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201 and criminal proceedings in general:

   Misdemeanor:

   A criminal offense that is less serious than a felony and is typically punishable by a fine, a short jail sentence, or both. Disorderly conduct is a misdemeanor in Maryland.

   Citation:

   A written order issued by a law enforcement officer requiring an individual to appear in court on a specific date to answer to a charge, or to pay a fine.

   Arraignment:

   The first formal court appearance in a criminal case where the defendant is read the charges against them and asked to enter a plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest).

   Discovery:

   The pre-trial process by which the prosecution and defense exchange information and evidence relevant to the case, including police reports, witness statements, and evidence lists.

   Plea Bargain:

   An agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant, often facilitated by their attorney, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in exchange for a concession from the prosecution (e.g., a lesser charge, a reduced sentence recommendation).

   Bench Trial:

   A trial in which a judge, rather than a jury, hears the evidence and decides the facts and applies the law to reach a verdict. Most misdemeanor cases in Maryland District Court are bench trials.

   Stet:

   A disposition in a criminal case where the state agrees to place the case on an inactive docket indefinitely, essentially postponing it. If certain conditions are met (e.g., no new arrests for a year), the case may eventually be closed without a conviction. It is not a dismissal but can lead to one.

   Common Scenarios & Questions

   Based on my extensive experience, individuals facing disorderly conduct charges often find themselves in similar situations or have comparable questions. These scenarios highlight how a momentary lapse in judgment or a misunderstanding can lead to serious legal consequences in Maryland.

   Scenario 1: The Heated Argument in Public
   Sarah and her friend are having a loud argument outside a bar in downtown Baltimore after closing hours. Their voices escalate, attracting the attention of passersby and eventually a patrolling police officer. The officer approaches, tells them to quiet down and disperse. Sarah, feeling her privacy is invaded, argues with the officer about her right to free speech. The officer then charges her with disorderly conduct for disturbing the peace and failing to obey a lawful order to disperse. Sarah believes she wasn’t doing anything illegal, just having an argument.

   Question: Can an argument, even if loud, constitute disorderly conduct if no one else explicitly complained?

   Answer: Yes, under Maryland Criminal Law Article § 10-201, the disturbance does not always require a formal complaint from a civilian. An officer observing conduct that is “likely to disturb the public peace” can be sufficient. The key is whether the conduct was objectively disorderly in a public place, and the failure to obey a lawful order to disperse further complicates Sarah’s situation.

   Scenario 2: Blocking a Sidewalk During a Protest
   David is participating in a peaceful protest on a public sidewalk in Annapolis. As the crowd grows, a portion of the sidewalk becomes completely impassable, forcing pedestrians into the street. A police officer repeatedly asks the group, including David, to move to allow free passage. David believes his right to protest allows him to remain. The officer arrests him for obstructing a public passageway and disorderly conduct.

   Question: Does freedom of speech protect a protester from a disorderly conduct charge if they are obstructing a public way?

   Answer: While the First Amendment protects the right to protest, this protection is not absolute and does not extend to physically obstructing public access. MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201 specifically addresses obstructing free passage. Officers can issue lawful orders to ensure public safety and order. A defense would involve assessing if the order was truly lawful and if there was an alternative, less restrictive way for the protest to occur.

   Scenario 3: Unwanted Noises at a Residential Party
   Mark hosts a backyard party in his suburban Maryland home. The music is loud, and neighbors have complained to him multiple times throughout the night. Around 1 AM, after another complaint, police arrive. They issue Mark a warning to turn down the music. An hour later, the police return because the music is still loud. They then issue Mark a citation for disorderly conduct, alleging disturbing the peace due to unreasonable noise.

   Question: Can disorderly conduct apply to noise from a private residence, or only public spaces?

   Answer: While disorderly conduct usually refers to public disturbances, behavior originating from private property can become a public disturbance if it impacts public peace or reaches a level that affects others in public view or hearing. In Mark’s case, the repeated complaints and the level of noise that disturbed neighbors, coupled with a prior warning, could lead to a valid disorderly conduct charge under the “unreasonable noise” aspect of MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201. However, the specific facts, local noise ordinances, and the definition of “unreasonable” would be key to a defense.

   Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

   Here are answers to some of the most common questions my clients at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. have regarding disorderly conduct charges in Maryland, drawing from years of firsthand experience:

   Q1: Is disorderly conduct a felony in Maryland?
   A1: No, disorderly conduct in Maryland is typically a misdemeanor offense. While not a felony, a conviction still carries serious penalties including potential jail time, fines, and a criminal record.

   Q2: What is the maximum penalty for disorderly conduct in Maryland?
   A2: Under Maryland Criminal Law Article § 10-201, the standard maximum penalty for disorderly conduct is up to 60 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $500.

   Q3: Can I get disorderly conduct expunged from my record in Maryland?
   A3: Yes, generally, a conviction for disorderly conduct in Maryland can be expunged under certain circumstances after a specific waiting period, provided you meet the eligibility criteria (e.g., no new convictions during the waiting period). Expungement is a complex process best navigated with an attorney.

   Q4: What’s the difference between disturbing the peace and disorderly conduct in Maryland?
   A4: In Maryland, “disturbing the peace” is often one of the specific ways disorderly conduct can be committed. MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201 outlines several acts that constitute disorderly conduct, and disturbing the peace through disorderly behavior is a primary one. So, disturbing the peace is a subset of disorderly conduct.

   Q5: Do I need a lawyer for a disorderly conduct charge?
   A5: While you are not legally required to have a lawyer for a misdemeanor, it is highly advisable. A seasoned attorney from Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. can identify legal defenses, negotiate with the prosecution, represent you in court, and protect your rights, significantly increasing your chances of a favorable outcome and mitigating long-term consequences.

   Q6: Can I be charged with disorderly conduct for yelling at someone in public?
   A6: Yes, if your yelling is loud enough to disturb the public peace, causes alarm, or constitutes “fighting words” (speech likely to incite immediate violence), you can be charged with disorderly conduct under Maryland law.

   Q7: What if the police told me to leave, but I didn’t?
   A7: Failing to obey a reasonable and lawful order of a law enforcement officer to disperse or move on from a public place is explicitly listed as a form of disorderly conduct under MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201. This can lead to a charge even if your initial conduct was not disorderly.

   Q8: Will a disorderly conduct conviction show up on a background check?
   A8: Yes, a conviction for disorderly conduct will typically appear on criminal background checks, which can be seen by potential employers, landlords, and educational institutions. This is why expungement, if eligible, is often pursued.

   Q9: How long does a disorderly conduct case take in Maryland?
   A9: The duration can vary. Simple cases might be resolved in a few weeks or months, especially if a plea agreement is reached. More complex cases, involving multiple court appearances, discovery, or a trial, can take many months, sometimes up to a year or more.

   Q10: What is a “Stet” in a Maryland disorderly conduct case?
   A10: A “Stet” (stet process) is an indefinite postponement of charges. The case is placed on an inactive docket. If the defendant stays out of trouble for a specified period (usually one year), the case can be closed without a conviction. It is not an admission of guilt and offers a path to potential dismissal without further court proceedings.

   Q11: Can private security guards charge me with disorderly conduct?
   A11: No, private security guards do not have the authority to charge you with a crime like disorderly conduct. They can detain you, contact the police, and provide information to law enforcement, who then make the decision to charge or arrest.

   Q12: What if I was intoxicated during the incident? Does that make a difference?
   A12: While public intoxication itself can be a separate offense or factor in police interaction, it is not a direct defense to disorderly conduct. However, your state of intoxication might be relevant if it impacts your intent or ability to understand lawful commands. It’s a complex area best discussed with your attorney.

   Q13: How does disorderly conduct affect my immigration status?
   A13: For non-U.S. citizens, any criminal conviction can potentially impact immigration status, including visa applications, green card renewals, and naturalization. While disorderly conduct is typically a minor offense, certain aggravating factors or a pattern of behavior could lead to issues. It’s critical to consult with both a criminal defense attorney and an immigration attorney if you are not a U.S. citizen.

   Q14: Are there different types of disorderly conduct in Maryland?
   A14: While there’s primarily one main statute (MD Criminal Law Article § 10-201), it covers various specific acts, such as disturbing the peace, obstructing public ways, failing to obey lawful orders, or disrupting school activities. The specific subsection you are charged under can influence the defense strategy.

   Q15: What evidence can be used against me in a disorderly conduct case?
   A15: Evidence can include police officer testimony, witness statements, body camera footage, surveillance video, audio recordings, and even your own statements made to the police. The prosecution will try to present any evidence that supports the elements of the charge.

   Contact Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Today

   If you or someone you know is facing disorderly conduct charges in Maryland, the time to act is now. The consequences of a conviction are far-reaching and can impact your future in significant ways. Don’t navigate the complexities of the Maryland legal system alone. At Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., we bring over 20 years of seasoned experience to every case, providing authoritative legal counsel and a tenacious defense. Protect your rights and your future. Call Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at 888-437-7747 for a confidential case review. Our knowledgeable team is ready to provide the strategic guidance you need.

   Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this content. Laws vary by jurisdiction, and the information may not be applicable to your specific situation. For legal advice regarding your individual circumstances, please consult with a qualified attorney at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. The outcomes of past cases do not guarantee similar results for future cases.